SMEDS Middle School Space Utilization — Pilot Analysis
St. Mary’s Episcopal Day School | Middle School Division
Report Date: March 28, 2026
Prepared by: Mai Nguyen
Academic Year: Semester 1, Quarter 1, AY 2025–26
Reviewer: Andrew Taylor

Analytic Scope This report covers the St. Mary’s Episcopal Day School Middle School division only (Grades 6–8). Data reflects Semester 1, Quarter 1, Academic Year 2025–2026. Schedule analysis is limited to Periods 2–5 (core academic sections). Period 1 electives, homeroom, and non-academic blocks are excluded from all metrics. Specialist rooms shared with lower divisions are reported separately in Section 7.

Metric Reference Legend

ATUAvg Time Utilization ASOAvg Seat Occupancy CSUICombined Space Utilization Index RERRoom Exclusivity Rate CBICapacity Buffer Index SERSpace Elasticity Ratio PDRPeak Demand Ratio PSMIQualitative — see §6.8 SSDNot computed — school-wide data unavailable IDIExcluded — redundant with ASO at SMEDS


2. School-Wide Summary

Aggregated metrics for the MS division as a whole: one number per metric across all in-scope rooms. See Key Findings (Section 3) for interpretation.

50.0%
ATU
Avg Time Utilization — MS-exclusive rooms
72.9%
ASO
Avg Seat Occupancy — MS-exclusive rooms
31.3%
CSUI
Avg Combined Index — all MS rooms
53.3%
RER
Room Exclusivity Rate — MS division

ATU averages 50% across MS-exclusive rooms; roughly half of available P2–P5 time is unscheduled. When sessions run, rooms fill to 72.9% on average, within the 60–75% target band.

⚠ Note — Period 1 excluded from both numerator and denominator. The ATU denominator is 23.33 hrs/wk = 4 in-scope periods (P2–P5) × 70 min × 5 days. Period 1 (Tuesday/Thursday electives for grades 7–8; homeroom/advisory for grade 6) is excluded from the schedule grid and from the denominator. ATU reflects P2–P5 core academic scheduling only. For rooms with confirmed P1 elective use (208, 213, 214, 218, 220, 221), adding Period 1 would shift both numerator and denominator, but the net effect on ATU is indeterminate: P1 session frequency was not in the schedule data.

3. Key Findings

  1. Time utilization. MS rooms average 50% ATU, meaning roughly half of available P2–P5 time is unscheduled. Whether the unused half represents genuine scheduling headroom depends on factors outside this dataset: full faculty load, non-teaching duties, and multi-division coordination.

  2. Seat occupancy. When sessions do run, MS rooms fill to 73% on average, within the 60–75% target band, but the distribution is wide. The Boardroom and Room 218 approach or exceed rated capacity at peak; Rooms 219 and 210 run consistently small classes relative to room size. These opposite problems call for different questions: Is the Boardroom’s high occupancy driven by enrollment alone, or do its features attract scheduling preference? Room 219 runs Latin exclusively (Grades 6–8, Gold section); small enrollment is structural for an elective language course. Room 210 runs core math sections (6th grade and Pre-Algebra, Gold track); whether small enrollment reflects section-level ability-grouping or a broader program decision is a question for the school.

  3. Space elasticity. The methodology document (updated 2026-02-23, covering 9 metrics) defines SER as the percentage of rooms that can accommodate ±30% enrollment variation without overcrowding or underfilling. At SMEDS, none of the 15 rooms in scope meet that threshold. The overcrowding condition is self-contained: 130% of the highest enrollment observed in the Q1 window must not exceed rated capacity. The underfilling condition requires a floor: 70% of the lowest observed enrollment must still clear some minimum occupancy threshold — but no threshold is specified for SER, so I inferred 50% of capacity from the ASO benchmark. That assumption has not been confirmed. The 3×3 labels in §6.4 sidestep this by using the school’s own quartile distribution rather than an unconfirmed absolute floor.

  4. Scheduling distribution. MS scheduling is evenly distributed across Periods 2–5 on both A and B days (PDR ≈ 1.1). No period concentrates demand. The ATU shortfall is a scheduling frequency problem, not a period distribution problem: the gap is in how often rooms are scheduled, not in which period carries the load.

  5. Scheduling control. Of the 15 MS rooms in scope, 8 are MS-exclusive and 7 are shared with Grade 5 or other divisions. Scheduling changes to the shared rooms require cross-division coordination; the MS division’s independent leverage is limited to the 8 exclusive rooms.

If Q1 scheduling reflects SMEDS’s typical pattern (and if scheduling decisions for the 8 MS-exclusive rooms sit within the MS division), these rooms average roughly 25 percentage points below the ATU target: scheduled half the time when three-quarters is the goal. The rooms are there; the gap is in how often they are scheduled. That reframes the capacity question: not whether SMEDS has enough rooms, but whether the current faculty load and section structure are using what the MS division already holds.

Open items for Andrew’s review before finalising
  • CBI: Algebraically redundant with ASO (CBI = 100 − ASO). Retain or remove? If removed, the CBI column in §4 and §6 will be dropped.
  • IDI: Redundant with ASO at SMEDS. Retain any density metric in the final report?
  • Notes §8: Please confirm whether any data limitation materially affects the analytical conclusions in §6 before this report is shared with Kristen.

4. Room Scorecard — Periods 2–5, Q1 2025–26

One row per room — all metrics at a glance. Schedule coverage map in Section 5; per-metric detail in Section 6.

Table 1: Room scorecard — all metrics, Periods 2–5, Q1 2025–26. [S] = shared room.
Room Type Ownership ATU % Sched hrs/wk ASO % Enroll (wtd avg) Capacity CSUI % CBI %† SER CSUI Band
208 Science Lab exclusive 50.0% 11.7 69.0% 20.0 29 34.5% 31.0% Moderate Median–75th pctile
210 Classroom exclusive 56.3% 13.1 42.9% 12.0 28 24.2% 57.1% Underutilized 25th pctile–Median
212 Classroom exclusive 50.0% 11.7 80.0% 24.0 30 40.0% 20.0% Well utilized Top 25%
213 Classroom exclusive 25.0% 5.8 80.0% 24.0 30 20.0% 20.0% Well utilized Bottom 25%
214 Classroom exclusive 50.0% 11.7 66.7% 20.0 30 33.4% 33.3% Moderate Median–75th pctile
220 Classroom exclusive 56.3% 13.1 62.5% 15.0 24 35.2% 37.5% Volatile Median–75th pctile
221 Classroom exclusive 50.0% 11.7 83.3% 20.0 24 41.6% 16.7% Well utilized Top 25%
Boardroom Classroom exclusive 62.5% 14.6 98.9% 18.8 19 61.8% 1.1% Under pressure Top 25%
209 [S] Classroom shared_w_Gr5 39.2% 8.8 58.6% 17.0 29 23.0% 41.4% Chronically sparse Bottom 25%
211 [S] Classroom shared_w_Gr5 42.9% 8.8 58.9% 17.7 30 25.3% 41.1% Moderate 25th pctile–Median
218 [S] Classroom shared_w_Gr5 33.3% 5.8 92.3% 24.0 26 30.7% 7.7% At/over capacity Median–75th pctile
219 [S] Classroom shared_w_Gr5 42.9% 8.8 27.8% 6.7 24 11.9% 72.2% Chronically sparse Bottom 25%
Art Room [S] Specialist shared_w_school 50.0% 11.7 83.7% 21.8 26 41.9% 16.3% Under pressure Top 25%
Music Room [S] Specialist shared_w_school 25.0% 5.8 68.3% 20.5 30 17.1% 31.7% Moderate Bottom 25%
Religious Studies room [S] Specialist shared_w_school 43.8% 10.2 66.9% 16.7 25 29.3% 33.1% Moderate 25th pctile–Median

[S] Rooms shared with Grade 5 or other divisions carry ATU/ASO caveats: metrics reflect MS Periods 2–5 usage only. See Section 8.

SER result reflects the ±30% elasticity test on the 2-week Q1 enrollment range. See Note 8.7.

† CBI = 100 − ASO (algebraically redundant with ASO). Retention pending Andrew’s confirmation (see Section 6.8).


5. Schedule Map

Room × period × day-type occupancy across the 2-week Q1 grid.

Column notation: Each period is split into two 35-min blocks: P2i = Period 2 first half (08:50–09:25) · P2ii = Period 2 second half (09:25–10:00), and so on for P3–P5. A 70-min class spans both halves and appears as a merged cell. A 35-min class occupies one half only.

Seat occupancy % (enrollment ÷ room capacity):

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% >100% Vacant

A-Day (canonical Monday)

Room P2i P2ii P3i P3ii P4i P4ii P5i P5ii
08:50-09:25 09:25-10:00 10:30-11:05 11:05-11:40 11:45-12:20 12:20-12:55 13:45-14:20 14:20-14:55
208
MS-only · Science Lab
1,176 sqft · 29 seats
65.5%
(19/29)
208 · Period 2 · A-day
7 LifeSci (Blue)
Breit
Enrollment: 19 / 29 seats · Occupancy: 65.5%
69.0%
(20/29)
208 · Period 3 · A-day
7 LifeSci (Gold)
Breit
Enrollment: 20 / 29 seats · Occupancy: 69.0%
208 · Period 4 · A-day
Vacant
208 · Period 4 · A-day
Vacant
208 · Period 5 · A-day
Vacant
208 · Period 5 · A-day
Vacant
210
MS-only · Classroom
840 sqft · 28 seats
21.4%
(6/28)
210 · Period 2 · A-day
6 Math6 (Blue)
Grieves
Enrollment: 6 / 28 seats · Occupancy: 21.4%
71.4%
(20/28)
210 · Period 2 · A-day
6 Math6 (Gold)
Grieves
Enrollment: 20 / 28 seats · Occupancy: 71.4%
210 · Period 3 · A-day
Vacant
210 · Period 3 · A-day
Vacant
35.7%
(10/28)
210 · Period 4 · A-day
7 PreAlg (Gold)
Grieves
Enrollment: 10 / 28 seats · Occupancy: 35.7%
210 · Period 5 · A-day
Vacant
210 · Period 5 · A-day
Vacant
212
MS-only · Classroom
900 sqft · 30 seats
212 · Period 2 · A-day
Vacant
212 · Period 2 · A-day
Vacant
212 · Period 3 · A-day
Vacant
212 · Period 3 · A-day
Vacant
80.0%
(24/30)
212 · Period 4 · A-day
6 LangArts (Blue)
Cárdenas
Enrollment: 24 / 30 seats · Occupancy: 80.0%
80.0%
(24/30)
212 · Period 5 · A-day
6 LangArts (Gold)
Cárdenas
Enrollment: 24 / 30 seats · Occupancy: 80.0%
213
MS-only · Classroom
900 sqft · 30 seats
213 · Period 2 · A-day
Vacant
213 · Period 2 · A-day
Vacant
213 · Period 3 · A-day
Vacant
213 · Period 3 · A-day
Vacant
80.0%
(24/30)
213 · Period 4 · A-day
6 GlobStud (Gold)
Boza
Enrollment: 24 / 30 seats · Occupancy: 80.0%
80.0%
(24/30)
213 · Period 5 · A-day
6 GlobStud (Blue)
Boza
Enrollment: 24 / 30 seats · Occupancy: 80.0%
214
MS-only · Classroom
900 sqft · 30 seats
66.7%
(20/30)
214 · Period 2 · A-day
8 USHist (Blue)
Bauer
Enrollment: 20 / 30 seats · Occupancy: 66.7%
214 · Period 3 · A-day
Vacant
214 · Period 3 · A-day
Vacant
214 · Period 4 · A-day
Vacant
214 · Period 4 · A-day
Vacant
70.0%
(21/30)
214 · Period 5 · A-day
8 USHist (Gold)
Bauer
Enrollment: 21 / 30 seats · Occupancy: 70.0%
220
MS-only · Classroom
736 sqft · 24 seats
91.7%
(22/24)
220 · Period 2 · A-day
6 PreAlg (Blue)
Cummins
Enrollment: 22 / 24 seats · Occupancy: 91.7%
220 · Period 2 · A-day
Vacant
58.3%
(14/24)
220 · Period 3 · A-day
8 Alg1H (Blue)
Cummins
Enrollment: 14 / 24 seats · Occupancy: 58.3%
37.5%
(9/24)
220 · Period 4 · A-day
7 PreAlg (Blue)
Cummins
Enrollment: 9 / 24 seats · Occupancy: 37.5%
220 · Period 5 · A-day
Vacant
220 · Period 5 · A-day
Vacant
221
MS-only · Classroom
736 sqft · 24 seats
221 · Period 2 · A-day
Vacant
221 · Period 2 · A-day
Vacant
79.2%
(19/24)
221 · Period 3 · A-day
7 LangArt70 (Blue)
Henson
Enrollment: 19 / 24 seats · Occupancy: 79.2%
221 · Period 4 · A-day
Vacant
221 · Period 4 · A-day
Vacant
83.3%
(20/24)
221 · Period 5 · A-day
7 LangArt70 (Gold)
Henson
Enrollment: 20 / 24 seats · Occupancy: 83.3%
Boardroom
MS-only · Classroom
580 sqft · 19 seats
110.5%
(21/19)
Boardroom · Period 2 · A-day
8 WritResS1 (Gold)
Delgado
Enrollment: 21 / 19 seats · Occupancy: 110.5%
110.5%
(21/19)
Boardroom · Period 3 · A-day
6 Span (Gold)
Miño
Enrollment: 21 / 19 seats · Occupancy: 110.5%
89.5%
(17/19)
Boardroom · Period 4 · A-day
8 Span (Gold)
Miño
Enrollment: 17 / 19 seats · Occupancy: 89.5%
105.3%
(20/19)
Boardroom · Period 5 · A-day
8 WritResS1 (Blue)
Delgado
Enrollment: 20 / 19 seats · Occupancy: 105.3%
209
Shared w/ Gr5 · Classroom
884 sqft · 29 seats
209 · Period 2 · A-day
Vacant
209 · Period 2 · A-day
Vacant
48.3%
(14/29)
209 · Period 3 · A-day
8 Alg1H (Gold)
Mendes
Enrollment: 14 / 29 seats · Occupancy: 48.3%
69.0%
(20/29)
209 · Period 4 · A-day
7 Alg1H (Blue)
Mendes
Enrollment: 20 / 29 seats · Occupancy: 69.0%
209 · Period 5 · A-day
Vacant
209 · Period 5 · A-day
Vacant
211
Shared w/ Gr5 · Classroom
900 sqft · 30 seats
211 · Period 2 · A-day
Vacant
211 · Period 2 · A-day
Vacant
70.0%
(21/30)
211 · Period 3 · A-day
6 Span (Blue)
Cosentino
Enrollment: 21 / 30 seats · Occupancy: 70.0%
56.7%
(17/30)
211 · Period 4 · A-day
8 Span (Blue)
Cosentino
Enrollment: 17 / 30 seats · Occupancy: 56.7%
211 · Period 5 · A-day
Vacant
211 · Period 5 · A-day
Vacant
218
Shared w/ Gr5 · Classroom
800 sqft · 26 seats
218 · Period 2 · A-day
Vacant
218 · Period 2 · A-day
Vacant
218 · Period 3 · A-day
Vacant
218 · Period 3 · A-day
Vacant
218 · Period 4 · A-day
Vacant
218 · Period 4 · A-day
Vacant
218 · Period 5 · A-day
Vacant
218 · Period 5 · A-day
Vacant
219
Shared w/ Gr5 · Classroom
736 sqft · 24 seats
219 · Period 2 · A-day
Vacant
219 · Period 2 · A-day
Vacant
25.0%
(6/24)
219 · Period 3 · A-day
6 Latin (Gold)
Sowerby
Enrollment: 6 / 24 seats · Occupancy: 25.0%
29.2%
(7/24)
219 · Period 4 · A-day
8 Latin (Gold)
Sowerby
Enrollment: 7 / 24 seats · Occupancy: 29.2%
219 · Period 5 · A-day
Vacant
219 · Period 5 · A-day
Vacant
Art Room
Shared w/ School · Specialist
1,170 sqft · 26 seats
76.9%
(20/26)
Art Room · Period 2 · A-day
7 ArtS1 (Gold)
Kenney
Enrollment: 20 / 26 seats · Occupancy: 76.9%
Art Room · Period 3 · A-day
Vacant
Art Room · Period 3 · A-day
Vacant
Art Room · Period 4 · A-day
Vacant
Art Room · Period 4 · A-day
Vacant
73.1%
(19/26)
Art Room · Period 5 · A-day
7 ArtS1 (Blue)
Kenney
Enrollment: 19 / 26 seats · Occupancy: 73.1%
Music Room
Shared w/ School · Specialist
1,365 sqft · 30 seats
Music Room · Period 2 · A-day
Vacant
Music Room · Period 2 · A-day
Vacant
Music Room · Period 3 · A-day
Vacant
Music Room · Period 3 · A-day
Vacant
Music Room · Period 4 · A-day
Vacant
Music Room · Period 4 · A-day
Vacant
Music Room · Period 5 · A-day
Vacant
Music Room · Period 5 · A-day
Vacant
Religious Studies room
Shared w/ School · Specialist
756 sqft · 25 seats
Religious Studies room · Period 2 · A-day
Vacant
Religious Studies room · Period 2 · A-day
Vacant
52.0%
(13/25)
Religious Studies room · Period 3 · A-day
8 Geom (Blue)
McLaughlin
Enrollment: 13 / 25 seats · Occupancy: 52.0%
Religious Studies room · Period 4 · A-day
Vacant
Religious Studies room · Period 4 · A-day
Vacant
Religious Studies room · Period 5 · A-day
Vacant
Religious Studies room · Period 5 · A-day
Vacant

B-Day (canonical Tuesday)

Room P2i P2ii P3i P3ii P4i P4ii P5i P5ii
08:50-09:25 09:25-10:00 10:30-11:05 11:05-11:40 11:45-12:20 12:20-12:55 13:45-14:20 14:20-14:55
208
MS-only · Science Lab
1,176 sqft · 29 seats
69.0%
(20/29)
208 · Period 2 · B-day
8 PhysSciH (Blue)
Sowerby
Enrollment: 20 / 29 seats · Occupancy: 69.0%
208 · Period 3 · B-day
Vacant
208 · Period 3 · B-day
Vacant
72.4%
(21/29)
208 · Period 4 · B-day
8 PhysSciH (Gold)
Sowerby
Enrollment: 21 / 29 seats · Occupancy: 72.4%
208 · Period 5 · B-day
Vacant
208 · Period 5 · B-day
Vacant
210
MS-only · Classroom
840 sqft · 28 seats
21.4%
(6/28)
210 · Period 2 · B-day
6 Math6 (Blue)
Grieves
Enrollment: 6 / 28 seats · Occupancy: 21.4%
210 · Period 3 · B-day
Vacant
210 · Period 3 · B-day
Vacant
35.7%
(10/28)
210 · Period 4 · B-day
7 PreAlg (Gold)
Grieves
Enrollment: 10 / 28 seats · Occupancy: 35.7%
210 · Period 4 · B-day
Vacant
71.4%
(20/28)
210 · Period 5 · B-day
6 Math6 (Gold)
Grieves
Enrollment: 20 / 28 seats · Occupancy: 71.4%
212
MS-only · Classroom
900 sqft · 30 seats
212 · Period 2 · B-day
Vacant
212 · Period 2 · B-day
Vacant
80.0%
(24/30)
212 · Period 3 · B-day
6 LangArts (Gold)
Cárdenas
Enrollment: 24 / 30 seats · Occupancy: 80.0%
80.0%
(24/30)
212 · Period 4 · B-day
6 LangArts (Blue)
Cárdenas
Enrollment: 24 / 30 seats · Occupancy: 80.0%
212 · Period 5 · B-day
Vacant
212 · Period 5 · B-day
Vacant
213
MS-only · Classroom
900 sqft · 30 seats
213 · Period 2 · B-day
Vacant
213 · Period 2 · B-day
Vacant
213 · Period 3 · B-day
Vacant
213 · Period 3 · B-day
Vacant
213 · Period 4 · B-day
Vacant
213 · Period 4 · B-day
Vacant
213 · Period 5 · B-day
Vacant
213 · Period 5 · B-day
Vacant
214
MS-only · Classroom
900 sqft · 30 seats
66.7%
(20/30)
214 · Period 2 · B-day
7 USHist (Gold)
Bauer
Enrollment: 20 / 30 seats · Occupancy: 66.7%
214 · Period 3 · B-day
Vacant
214 · Period 3 · B-day
Vacant
214 · Period 4 · B-day
Vacant
214 · Period 4 · B-day
Vacant
63.3%
(19/30)
214 · Period 5 · B-day
7 USHist (Blue)
Bauer
Enrollment: 19 / 30 seats · Occupancy: 63.3%
220
MS-only · Classroom
736 sqft · 24 seats
91.7%
(22/24)
220 · Period 2 · B-day
6 PreAlg (Blue)
Cummins
Enrollment: 22 / 24 seats · Occupancy: 91.7%
220 · Period 3 · B-day
Vacant
58.3%
(14/24)
220 · Period 3 · B-day
8 Alg1H (Blue)
Cummins
Enrollment: 14 / 24 seats · Occupancy: 58.3%
37.5%
(9/24)
220 · Period 4 · B-day
7 PreAlg (Blue)
Cummins
Enrollment: 9 / 24 seats · Occupancy: 37.5%
220 · Period 4 · B-day
Vacant
220 · Period 5 · B-day
Vacant
220 · Period 5 · B-day
Vacant
221
MS-only · Classroom
736 sqft · 24 seats
221 · Period 2 · B-day
Vacant
221 · Period 2 · B-day
Vacant
221 · Period 3 · B-day
Vacant
221 · Period 3 · B-day
Vacant
83.3%
(20/24)
221 · Period 4 · B-day
8 LangArt70 (Blue)
Henson
Enrollment: 20 / 24 seats · Occupancy: 83.3%
87.5%
(21/24)
221 · Period 5 · B-day
8 LangArt70 (Gold)
Henson
Enrollment: 21 / 24 seats · Occupancy: 87.5%
Boardroom
MS-only · Classroom
580 sqft · 19 seats
Boardroom · Period 2 · B-day
Vacant
Boardroom · Period 2 · B-day
Vacant
78.9%
(15/19)
Boardroom · Period 3 · B-day
7 Span (Gold)
Delgado
Enrollment: 15 / 19 seats · Occupancy: 78.9%
Boardroom · Period 4 · B-day
Vacant
Boardroom · Period 4 · B-day
Vacant
Boardroom · Period 5 · B-day
Vacant
Boardroom · Period 5 · B-day
Vacant
209
Shared w/ Gr5 · Classroom
884 sqft · 29 seats
209 · Period 2 · B-day
Vacant
209 · Period 2 · B-day
Vacant
209 · Period 3 · B-day
Vacant
48.3%
(14/29)
209 · Period 3 · B-day
8 Alg1H (Gold)
Mendes
Enrollment: 14 / 29 seats · Occupancy: 48.3%
69.0%
(20/29)
209 · Period 4 · B-day
7 Alg1H (Blue)
Mendes
Enrollment: 20 / 29 seats · Occupancy: 69.0%
209 · Period 4 · B-day
Vacant
209 · Period 5 · B-day
Vacant
209 · Period 5 · B-day
Vacant
211
Shared w/ Gr5 · Classroom
900 sqft · 30 seats
211 · Period 2 · B-day
Vacant
211 · Period 2 · B-day
Vacant
50.0%
(15/30)
211 · Period 3 · B-day
7 Span (Blue)
Cosentino
Enrollment: 15 / 30 seats · Occupancy: 50.0%
211 · Period 4 · B-day
Vacant
211 · Period 4 · B-day
Vacant
211 · Period 5 · B-day
Vacant
211 · Period 5 · B-day
Vacant
218
Shared w/ Gr5 · Classroom
800 sqft · 26 seats
218 · Period 2 · B-day
Vacant
218 · Period 2 · B-day
Vacant
92.3%
(24/26)
218 · Period 3 · B-day
6 EarthSci (Blue)
Tuohy
Enrollment: 24 / 26 seats · Occupancy: 92.3%
92.3%
(24/26)
218 · Period 4 · B-day
6 EarthSci (Gold)
Tuohy
Enrollment: 24 / 26 seats · Occupancy: 92.3%
218 · Period 5 · B-day
Vacant
218 · Period 5 · B-day
Vacant
219
Shared w/ Gr5 · Classroom
736 sqft · 24 seats
219 · Period 2 · B-day
Vacant
219 · Period 2 · B-day
Vacant
29.2%
(7/24)
219 · Period 3 · B-day
7 Latin (Gold)
Sowerby
Enrollment: 7 / 24 seats · Occupancy: 29.2%
219 · Period 4 · B-day
Vacant
219 · Period 4 · B-day
Vacant
219 · Period 5 · B-day
Vacant
219 · Period 5 · B-day
Vacant
Art Room
Shared w/ School · Specialist
1,170 sqft · 26 seats
76.9%
(20/26)
Art Room · Period 2 · B-day
6 EnrArtQ1 (Gold)
Kenney
Enrollment: 20 / 26 seats · Occupancy: 76.9%
Art Room · Period 3 · B-day
Vacant
Art Room · Period 3 · B-day
Vacant
Art Room · Period 4 · B-day
Vacant
Art Room · Period 4 · B-day
Vacant
107.7%
(28/26)
Art Room · Period 5 · B-day
6 EnrArtQ1 (Blue)
Kenney
Enrollment: 28 / 26 seats · Occupancy: 107.7%
Music Room
Shared w/ School · Specialist
1,365 sqft · 30 seats
70.0%
(21/30)
Music Room · Period 2 · B-day
8 EnrPerfQ1 (Gold)
Delgado/Craig
Enrollment: 21 / 30 seats · Occupancy: 70.0%
Music Room · Period 3 · B-day
Vacant
Music Room · Period 3 · B-day
Vacant
Music Room · Period 4 · B-day
Vacant
Music Room · Period 4 · B-day
Vacant
66.7%
(20/30)
Music Room · Period 5 · B-day
8 EnrPerfQ1 (Blue)
Delgado/Craig
Enrollment: 20 / 30 seats · Occupancy: 66.7%
Religious Studies room
Shared w/ School · Specialist
756 sqft · 25 seats
76.0%
(19/25)
Religious Studies room · Period 2 · B-day
7 EnrReligQ1 (Blue)
McLaughlin
Enrollment: 19 / 25 seats · Occupancy: 76.0%
Religious Studies room · Period 3 · B-day
Vacant
52.0%
(13/25)
Religious Studies room · Period 3 · B-day
8 Geom (Blue)
McLaughlin
Enrollment: 13 / 25 seats · Occupancy: 52.0%
Religious Studies room · Period 4 · B-day
Vacant
Religious Studies room · Period 4 · B-day
Vacant
80.0%
(20/25)
Religious Studies room · Period 5 · B-day
7 EnrReligQ1 (Gold)
McLaughlin
Enrollment: 20 / 25 seats · Occupancy: 80.0%

Hover any cell for room · period · grade/course/section · teacher · enrollment/capacity · occupancy %.


6. Metric Analysis

Metrics computed for this pilot:

Metric Question it answers Formula / notes
ATU — Average Time Utilization How often is this room scheduled? Scheduled hrs ÷ available hrs, Periods 2–5
ASO — Average Seat Occupancy When sessions run, how full is the room? Duration-weighted enrollment ÷ room capacity
CSUI — Combined Space Utilization Index How productively is this room used overall? ATU × ASO composite
CBI — Capacity Buffer Index How much capacity buffer exists above average enrollment? 100 − ASO (provisional — see Open Items, §3)
SER — Space Elasticity Ratio Does this room’s enrollment range fit its capacity? Enrollment range vs. capacity; quartile-based labels
RER — Room Exclusivity Rate How much of the MS footprint does the division control directly? Exclusive rooms ÷ total MS rooms
PDR — Peak Demand Ratio Is scheduling load evenly spread across periods, or concentrated at peak? Peak-period sessions ÷ mean sessions per period

Full metric definitions, non-computed metrics, and data pipeline details are in the technical provenance document.

6.1 ATU — Average Time Utilization

ATU = hrs_wk_scheduled ÷ hrs_wk_available × 100
Denominator baseline: 23.33 hrs/wk (P2–P5 × 70 min × 5 days). Grade 5 sharing reductions applied per room: Room 209 −1 hr/wk; Room 218 −5.833 hrs/wk (Hill’s A-day schedule); Rooms 219 and 211 −2.917 hrs/wk.
Benchmark: ≥75% Optimised | 60–74% Healthy | 30–59% Review | <30% Action needed
School distribution: (N=15): 25th pctile = 41.0% | Median = 50.0% | 75th pctile = 50.0% | SD = 10.9%.
The In-School Distribution column shows each room’s rank within this school only — not against an external benchmark. ‘Top 25%’ means the room scores above the 75th percentile of MS rooms; ‘Bottom 25%’ means it falls below the 25th percentile.
Table 2: ATU by room — scheduled vs. available hours, Periods 2–5, Q1 2025–26.
Room Type Ownership Sched hrs/wk Avail hrs/wk ATU % Benchmark In-School Distribution
Boardroom Classroom exclusive 14.58 23.33 62.5 Healthy (60–74%) Top 25%
210 Classroom exclusive 13.12 23.33 56.3 Review (30–59%) Top 25%
220 Classroom exclusive 13.12 23.33 56.3 Review (30–59%) Top 25%
208 Science Lab exclusive 11.67 23.33 50.0 Review (30–59%) Median–75th pctile
212 Classroom exclusive 11.67 23.33 50.0 Review (30–59%) Median–75th pctile
214 Classroom exclusive 11.67 23.33 50.0 Review (30–59%) Median–75th pctile
221 Classroom exclusive 11.67 23.33 50.0 Review (30–59%) Median–75th pctile
Art Room Specialist shared_w_school 11.67 23.33 50.0 Review (30–59%) Median–75th pctile
Religious Studies room Specialist shared_w_school 10.21 23.33 43.8 Review (30–59%) 25th pctile–Median
211 Classroom shared_w_Gr5 8.75 20.41 42.9 Review (30–59%) 25th pctile–Median
219 Classroom shared_w_Gr5 8.75 20.41 42.9 Review (30–59%) 25th pctile–Median
209 Classroom shared_w_Gr5 8.75 22.33 39.2 Review (30–59%) Bottom 25%
218 Classroom shared_w_Gr5 5.83 17.50 33.3 Review (30–59%) Bottom 25%
213 Classroom exclusive 5.83 23.33 25.0 Action needed (<30%) Bottom 25%
Music Room Specialist shared_w_school 5.83 23.33 25.0 Action needed (<30%) Bottom 25%

No room reaches the ≥75% ATU target. The Boardroom is the only room above the 60% floor, at 62.5%. All others fall below 60%; Room 213 and Music Room are the lowest at 25%. The MS-exclusive average is 50%. Four periods (P2–P5) set the ceiling: 280 min of potential scheduling time per day, but most rooms host fewer than 4 sections. Grade 5 shared rooms show similarly low ATU; their denominators are adjusted downward but scheduling frequency remains low.

Note: the median equals Q3 (both 50.0%) because five rooms share an identical scheduled load of 11.67 hrs/wk, collapsing the upper-middle of the distribution. The SD of 10.9% reflects spread at the tails (two rooms at 25% ATU and one at 62.5%) rather than genuine variance across the majority of rooms.

⚠ Note 6.1 — ATU denominator excludes Period 1; Grade 5 deductions for Rooms 218, 219, 211 are inferred. Denominator = 23.33 hrs/wk (Periods 2–5 only). Room 218 denominator reduced by 5.833 hrs/wk (inferred from specialist schedules; Q1 period confirmed). Rooms 219 and 211 each reduced by 2.917 hrs/wk (inferred from school records, applied to Q1).

6.2 ASO — Average Seat Occupancy

ASO = (Duration-Weighted Average Enrollment ÷ Room Capacity) × 100
Enrollment weighted by section duration (minutes): a 70-min session counts twice as much as a 35-min session, reflecting actual seat-time consumed rather than a simple average across sessions. For example, a room hosting 25 students for 70 min and 10 students for 35 min has a weighted average of (25×70 + 10×35) ÷ (70+35) = 20 students (closer to the longer session). Capacity from confirmed room inventory (sqft ÷ 30 for classrooms; sqft ÷ 40 for Science Lab Room 208).
Benchmark: 60–75% target | <50% oversized | >85% crowded
School distribution: (N=15): 25th pctile = 60.7% | Median = 68.3% | 75th pctile = 81.7% | SD = 18.4%.
The In-School Distribution column shows each room’s rank within this school only — not against an external benchmark. ‘Top 25%’ means the room scores above the 75th percentile of MS rooms; ‘Bottom 25%’ means it falls below the 25th percentile.
Table 3: ASO by room — duration-weighted enrollment vs. capacity, Q1 2025–26.
Room Type Capacity Enroll (wtd avg) ASO % Benchmark In-School Distribution
Boardroom Classroom 19 18.80 98.9 Full (≥75%) Top 25%
218 Classroom 26 24.00 92.3 Full (≥75%) Top 25%
Art Room Specialist 26 21.75 83.7 Full (≥75%) Top 25%
221 Classroom 24 20.00 83.3 Full (≥75%) Top 25%
212 Classroom 30 24.00 80.0 Full (≥75%) Median–75th pctile
213 Classroom 30 24.00 80.0 Full (≥75%) Median–75th pctile
208 Science Lab 29 20.00 69.0 Moderate (50–74%) Median–75th pctile
Music Room Specialist 30 20.50 68.3 Moderate (50–74%) Median–75th pctile
Religious Studies room Specialist 25 16.71 66.9 Moderate (50–74%) 25th pctile–Median
214 Classroom 30 20.00 66.7 Moderate (50–74%) 25th pctile–Median
220 Classroom 24 15.00 62.5 Moderate (50–74%) 25th pctile–Median
211 Classroom 30 17.67 58.9 Moderate (50–74%) Bottom 25%
209 Classroom 29 17.00 58.6 Moderate (50–74%) Bottom 25%
210 Classroom 28 12.00 42.9 Low (25–49%) Bottom 25%
219 Classroom 24 6.67 27.8 Low (25–49%) Bottom 25%

The ASO distribution splits the MS portfolio into two opposite groups: rooms consistently filled to or past rated capacity, and rooms running small classes relative to room size. The MS-exclusive average of 72.9% sits within the 60–75% target band but conceals both extremes. The Boardroom (98.9% ASO) and Room 218 (92.3%) are both in the crowding zone, but they are not equivalent: Room 218 approaches its rated ceiling; the Boardroom exceeds it. Peak MS enrollment reaches 21 students against a rated capacity of 19. That distinction matters because the Boardroom’s constraint is physical: its 580 sqft footprint caps capacity at 19 seats (30 sqft/student regulatory standard), and no scheduling change raises that ceiling. At the other extreme, Room 219 (27.8%) and Room 210 (42.9%) are structurally low-occupancy: classes assigned to these rooms are small relative to room size.

6.3 CSUI — Combined Space Utilization Index

CSUI = ATU (decimal) × ASO (decimal)
Composite productivity indicator combining time and seat utilization.
Benchmark: >0.50 (50%) strong | 0.30–0.50 moderate | <0.30 weak
School distribution: (N=15): 25th pctile = 23.6% | Median = 30.7% | 75th pctile = 37.6% | SD = 12.3%.
The In-School Distribution column shows each room’s rank within this school only — not against an external benchmark. ‘Top 25%’ means the room scores above the 75th percentile of MS rooms; ‘Bottom 25%’ means it falls below the 25th percentile.

ATU caps CSUI for most rooms: with the majority below 50% time utilization, the ATU × ASO product rarely clears the 50% threshold even at high seat fill. The Boardroom is the exception: near-capacity enrollment pushes its CSUI to 61.8% despite moderate scheduling frequency.

Table 4: CSUI by room — ATU × ASO composite, with projected CSUI at 75% ATU target.
Room ATU % ASO % CSUI % CSUI @ 75% ATU Benchmark In-School Distribution
Boardroom 62.5 98.9 61.8 74.2 Strong Top 25%
Art Room 50.0 83.7 41.9 62.8 Moderate Top 25%
221 50.0 83.3 41.6 62.5 Moderate Top 25%
212 50.0 80.0 40.0 60.0 Moderate Top 25%
220 56.3 62.5 35.2 46.9 Moderate Median–75th pctile
208 50.0 69.0 34.5 51.7 Moderate Median–75th pctile
214 50.0 66.7 33.4 50.0 Moderate Median–75th pctile
218 33.3 92.3 30.7 69.2 Moderate Median–75th pctile
Religious Studies room 43.8 66.9 29.3 50.2 Weak 25th pctile–Median
211 42.9 58.9 25.3 44.2 Weak 25th pctile–Median
210 56.3 42.9 24.2 32.2 Weak 25th pctile–Median
209 39.2 58.6 23.0 44.0 Weak Bottom 25%
213 25.0 80.0 20.0 60.0 Weak Bottom 25%
Music Room 25.0 68.3 17.1 51.2 Weak Bottom 25%
219 42.9 27.8 11.9 20.9 Weak Bottom 25%

The MS division average CSUI of 31.3% sits at the lower end of the 30–50% range. Only the Boardroom clears the 50% threshold (61.8%). The CSUI @ 75% ATU column is a mechanical benchmark scenario: it holds ASO constant and shows where each room would land if scheduling frequency alone reached the ATU target.

6.4 SER — Space Elasticity Ratio

SER 3×3 label: rooms classified by floor band (Min occ%) × peak band (Peak occ%), each split at Q1 and Q3 of the school’s own distribution. Labels: Chronically sparse | Underutilized | Volatile | Sparse peak | Moderate | Under pressure | Well utilized | At/over capacity.
Min occ% = enroll_min / Room_Capacity × 100 (occupancy at lowest observed enrollment) — (N=15): 25th pctile = 49.1% | Median = 65.5% | 75th pctile = 79.1% | SD = 21.3%.
Peak occ% = enroll_max / Room_Capacity × 100 (occupancy at highest observed enrollment) — (N=15): 25th pctile = 70.0% | Median = 80.0% | 75th pctile = 89.6% | SD = 19.2%.
Headroom% = (Room_Capacity − enroll_max) / Room_Capacity × 100 (slack at peak; negative = over capacity)
Occ range% = Peak occ% − Min occ%
Column colors for Min occ% and Peak occ% show each room’s rank within this school: green = top 25%, yellow = middle, red = bottom 25%.
SER dot plot. Each horizontal line captures a room's enrollment range: minimum occupancy rate (open dot) to peak occupancy rate (filled dot). Orange dashed line = Q1 of floor occ% (low floor threshold); green dashed line = Q3 of peak occ% (high peak threshold).

Figure 1: SER dot plot. Each horizontal line captures a room’s enrollment range: minimum occupancy rate (open dot) to peak occupancy rate (filled dot). Orange dashed line = Q1 of floor occ% (low floor threshold); green dashed line = Q3 of peak occ% (high peak threshold).

Table 5: SER by room: enrollment range, headroom, and 3×3 label. Floor bands (Min occ%): low <49.1% | mid 49.1–79.1% | high >79.1%. Peak bands (Peak occ%): low <70.0% | mid 70.0–89.6% | high >89.6%. Sorted by headroom (tightest first).
Combined (A+B)
A-Day
B-Day
Room Capacity Min occ% Peak occ% Occ range (pp) Headroom% N sec Peak% N sec Peak% Label
Boardroom 19 78.9 110.5 31.6 -10.5 4 110.5 1 78.9 Under pressure
(mid floor, high peak)
Art Room 26 73.1 107.7 34.6 -7.7 2 76.9 2 107.7 Under pressure
(mid floor, high peak)
218 26 92.3 92.3 0.0 7.7 2 92.3 At/over capacity
(high floor, high peak)
220 24 37.5 91.7 54.2 8.3 3 91.7 3 91.7 Volatile
(low floor, high peak)
221 24 79.2 87.5 8.3 12.5 2 83.3 2 87.5 Well utilized
(high floor, mid peak)
212 30 80.0 80.0 0.0 20.0 2 80 2 80 Well utilized
(high floor, mid peak)
213 30 80.0 80.0 0.0 20.0 2 80 Well utilized
(high floor, mid peak)
Religious Studies room 25 52.0 80.0 28.0 20.0 1 52 3 80 Moderate
(mid floor, mid peak)
208 29 65.5 72.4 6.9 27.6 2 69 2 72.4 Moderate
(mid floor, mid peak)
210 28 21.4 71.4 50.0 28.6 3 71.4 3 71.4 Underutilized
(low floor, mid peak)
214 30 63.3 70.0 6.7 30.0 2 70 2 66.7 Moderate
(mid floor, mid peak)
211 30 50.0 70.0 20.0 30.0 2 70 1 50 Moderate
(mid floor, mid peak)
Music Room 30 66.7 70.0 3.3 30.0 2 70 Moderate
(mid floor, mid peak)
209 29 48.3 69.0 20.7 31.0 2 69 2 69 Chronically sparse
(low floor, low peak)
219 24 25.0 29.2 4.2 70.8 2 29.2 1 29.2 Chronically sparse
(low floor, low peak)

Four enrollment patterns emerge:

  • Boardroom and Art Room are labeled Under pressure (mid floor, high peak) and carry negative headroom: enrollment exceeds rated capacity at peak (-10.5% and -7.7% respectively). Room 218 is labeled At/over capacity by the school-relative framework, ranking highest on both floor and peak occupancy within this school, though headroom stays positive at 7.7%.
  • Room 220 is the only room labeled Volatile: peak reaches 91.7% on some sessions and falls to 37.5% on others, a 54-point swing.
  • Rooms 219 and 209 are labeled Chronically sparse: both floor and peak fall in the bottom quartile of the school’s distribution. Room 219 is the more extreme case; even its peak session (29.2%) barely clears 30%. Room 210 is labeled Underutilized.
  • The remaining eight rooms divide into two groups: five (208, 211, 214, Music Room, Religious Studies) are labeled Moderate, with occupancy in the middle band on both floor and peak; three (212, 213, 221) are labeled Well utilized, with floor occupancy in the top quartile. All eight carry positive headroom.
⚠ Note 6.4 — SER based on 2-week enrollment range only. enroll_min and enroll_max reflect variation observed within the Q1 2-week schedule grid, not year-over-year enrollment swings. See Note 8.7.

6.5 PDR — Peak Demand Ratio

PDR = blocks at peak period ÷ mean blocks per period (by day type)
Counting unit: 35-min blocks (the smallest schedulable unit at SMEDS). A 70-min session = 2 blocks; a 35-min half-period = 1 block. Computed on the canonical A-day and B-day (Week 1) only. Gym excluded; Grade 5 sessions in shared rooms excluded.

PDR result — no scheduling concentration A-day PDR: 1.16  |  B-day PDR: 1.12
Both A-day and B-day values are close to 1.0, indicating even distribution of sessions across Periods 2–5. No single period carries a disproportionate share of MS room use. The ATU shortfall is a scheduling frequency problem, not a within-day distribution problem.

6.6 RER — Room Exclusivity Rate

RER = n_exclusive ÷ n_total_ms_rooms × 100
Grouping unit: MS division. MS-only rooms count toward the exclusive numerator; Grade 5 cross-division rooms and whole-school specialist rooms (Art, Music, Religious Studies) are included in the denominator but not the numerator. See Section 6.8 for the Strings classroom note.
Answers: what fraction of the rooms MS uses are under exclusive MS scheduling control?
Table 6: RER — room count by ownership category.
Ownership N rooms % of MS rooms Note
exclusive 8 53.3 MS-only — full metrics apply
shared_w_Gr5 4 26.7 Grade 5 cross-division — ATU denominator adjusted
shared_w_school 3 20.0 Whole-school specialist — MS metrics are partial

RER = 53.3% (8 exclusive / 15 total MS rooms)

At 53%, MS has exclusive scheduling control over 8 of 15 rooms in its footprint. The remaining 7 carry attribution caveats: 4 are shared with Grade 5 with documented hour deductions; 3 are whole-school specialist rooms (Art Room, Music Room, Religious Studies) with no divisional hour allocation available. No published benchmark for RER exists. The 53% rate reflects the typical K–8 pattern of shared specialist facilities; it marks the extent of cross-division coordination required, not a performance gap. Metric accuracy for those 7 rooms is also lower: no complete cross-division schedule was available, so the figures reflect data gaps as much as actual sharing patterns.

6.7 Cross-Metric Analysis

Three patterns stand out across the four metrics:

  • Boardroom is the most heavily used room in the MS portfolio, scheduled 62.5% of available time and running at 98.9% occupancy when in session. It is the only room already past its rated capacity at peak (headroom -10.5%).
  • Rooms 213 and Music Room tell the opposite story. Both are scheduled only 25% of the time, but when sessions run they fill to 80% and 68.3% respectively. The gap is scheduling frequency, not class size.
  • Room 219 is the exception on both dimensions: moderate scheduling (42.9% ATU) but very low occupancy when in use (27.8% ASO), giving it the lowest CSUI in the portfolio.

The cross-tabs below assign each room to a quadrant and show which rooms MS can act on independently.

Cross-metric heatmap — ATU, ASO, and CSUI each scale from pale (weakest in SMEDS) to dark green (strongest); Headroom uses a diverging scale: red for over capacity, white at break-even, dark green for positive headroom. Rooms sorted top-to-bottom by CSUI.

Figure 2: Cross-metric heatmap — ATU, ASO, and CSUI each scale from pale (weakest in SMEDS) to dark green (strongest); Headroom uses a diverging scale: red for over capacity, white at break-even, dark green for positive headroom. Rooms sorted top-to-bottom by CSUI.

No room reaches the ATU ≥75% target; the entire portfolio sits in the Low ATU half of the grid.

ATU × ASO

The table below places each room in an ATU × ASO quadrant. ASO splits at 60% (target band floor); ATU splits at 60% (Healthy benchmark floor).

Seat Occupancy (ASO)
ATU ASO ≥60% ASO <60%
High ATU (≥60%) Boardroom
Low ATU (<60%) 218, Art Room, 221, 212, 213, 208, Music Room, Religious Studies room, 214, 220 211, 209, 210, 219

SER label × ATU

SER label High ATU (≥60%) Low ATU (<60%)
Under pressure Boardroom Art Room
At/over capacity 218
Volatile 220
Well utilized 212, 213, 221
Moderate 208, 211, 214, Music Room, Religious Studies room
Underutilized 210
Chronically sparse 209, 219

Low ATU + Under pressure is the key disambiguation cell: Room 218 appears crowded at peak but is rarely scheduled; the constraint is scheduling frequency, not physical capacity. The Boardroom is the only High ATU + Under pressure room: a genuine physical constraint that no scheduling change resolves.

SER label × Ownership

SER label Exclusive (MS-only) Shared w/ School Shared w/ Gr5
Under pressure Boardroom Art Room
At/over capacity 218
Volatile 220
Well utilized 212, 213, 221
Moderate 208, 214 Music Room, Religious Studies room 211
Underutilized 210
Chronically sparse 209, 219

Ownership determines actionability: exclusive rooms with non-Moderate SER labels are under full MS scheduling control; shared rooms require cross-division coordination before any change is possible.

6.8 Metrics Considered but Excluded or Deferred

PSMI — Program–Space Match Index

The schedule data offers a partial read on program-space fit: specialist rooms are used by the teachers whose disciplines they are built for (Art Room → art; Music Room → performing arts; Religious Studies room → theology). A formal PSMI score cannot be computed from the MS-only schedule grid: it would exclude individual student sessions and Lower School classes that also use these rooms, and those gaps would structurally bias any index derived from MS data alone.

The data confirms that no specialist room is being repurposed for non-specialist instruction, which is the core concern PSMI is designed to flag. That finding holds.

Strings classroom note: The Strings room is excluded from the room inventory: no Grade 6–8 instructional sessions appear during Periods 2–5. If Strings sessions were included, the room would rank among the highest ATU in the building.

CBI — Capacity Buffer Index (provisional). CBI = 100 − ASO, making it algebraically redundant with ASO. The headroom% column in the SER table (Section 6.4) conveys the same capacity-slack information with a signed framing (negative = over capacity). See Open Items in §3.

SSD — School Schedule Density (not computed). Requires a complete room inventory across all divisions. Only the MS P2–P5 schedule is available from SMEDS.

IDI — Instructional Density Index (excluded). At SMEDS, IDI is algebraically redundant with ASO (capacity derived from sqft ÷ SREF standard). Not an established industry metric with universal benchmarks. If a code-compliance check is needed, implement as a boolean: actual sqft/student ≥ SREF minimum.

See Open Items in §3.


7. Shared Specialist Rooms: Cross-Division Usage Context

Art Room, Music Room, and Religious Studies room are shared across divisions; no formal MS-only hour allocation exists, so their ATU and ASO reflect MS P2–P5 use only. Instructional hours from teacher schedule data give a cross-division picture: confirmed sessions span grades 3–8 for Art, grades 4–8 for Religious Studies, and grades 5–8 for Music. Cross-division implied ATU reaches 69.4% for the Art Room and 50.2% for Music and Religious Studies, confirming these rooms are meaningfully occupied beyond MS. MS-only figures substantially understate their actual occupancy.

Table 7: Specialist rooms: MS-only metrics vs. cross-division implied ATU from teacher schedule data.
Metric Art Room Music Room Religious Studies room
MS sched hrs/wk 11.7 5.8 10.2
ATU % (MS only) 50.0% 25.0% 43.8%
ASO % (MS only) 83.7% 68.3% 66.9%
Cross-div instr hrs/wk (P2–5) 16.2 11.7 11.7
Implied ATU % (cross-div) 69.4% 50.2% 50.2%
⚠ Note 7.1 — Specialist room columns reflect two different data sources. MS ATU and ASO are derived from the MS P2–P5 schedule. The “Specialist instr hrs/wk” and “Implied ATU” columns are derived from specialist teacher schedules covering all grade divisions. Short elective sessions at day-start were excluded to keep the denominator consistent with the MS ATU window. Methodology details are in the technical provenance document.

8. Data Notes

Note 8.1 — Enrollment data reflects the Q1 2025-26 SIS snapshot Enrollment figures reflect the Q1 SIS export (January 21, 2026). For ongoing monitoring, refresh the SIS export at each quarter end.
Note 8.2 — Period 1 excluded from all metrics by design Period 1 is excluded from all metrics by design. The ATU denominator (23.33 hrs/wk) covers Periods 2–5 only; this boundary is consistent across all rooms.
Note 8.3 — Rooms 209, 211, 218, 219: Grade 5 sharing reduces available time Four rooms share time with Grade 5. ATU denominators are adjusted downward for each; the adjustments range from 1 to 5.8 hrs/wk depending on the room. Methodology details are in the technical provenance document.
Note 8.5 — Boardroom is over capacity at peak; division allocation unresolved The Boardroom has a confirmed rated capacity of 19 seats. At peak MS enrollment, occupancy reaches 21 students, exceeding rated capacity (headroom -10.5%). The capacity constraint is structural: at 580 sqft, the regulatory standard (30 sqft/student) yields a fixed 19-seat ceiling. The room is also used by the Lower School division daily; no confirmed MS/LS time allocation exists. ASO figures for the Boardroom reflect MS schedule sessions only and do not account for Lower School use.
Note 8.6 — Room Exclusivity Rate counts MS-only rooms as exclusive Specialist rooms shared with other divisions are included in the denominator but not the numerator. See §6.8 for the Strings classroom note.

Note 8.7 — SER label is school-relative (quartile-based); binary ±30% threshold deferred The SER label in Section 4 and Section 6.4 uses this school’s own quartile distribution: rooms at or below the 25th percentile of min occ% are labelled Underutilized; rooms at or above the 75th percentile of peak occ% are labelled Under pressure. Labels describe position within SMEDS’s own distribution, not benchmarks against other schools. The binary ±30% pass/fail threshold is deferred pending Andrew’s review. enroll_min/max reflect the Q1 2-week schedule grid only, not year-over-year enrollment swings.

Because this pilot covers 15 rooms, the ‘Under pressure’ and ‘Underutilized’ labels identify the handful of rooms at the most extreme ends of SMEDS’s own range. With only 3–4 rooms per quartile boundary, a single room reclassification shifts the cutoff. Treat them as directional signals, not exact grades.

SMEDS Space Utilization — Pilot Analysis  |  SpaceLogic Analytics  |  Generated 2026-03-28